Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘ondvd’

poster_petedragonYet another trend from Disney which tends to fall flat with each attempt. However, this one wasn’t as bad as I had expected. In fact that’s the best I could say about it; albeit insanely unoriginal in plot, this live action retell of Pete’s Dragon didn’t entirely suck.

Pete’a Dragon is about a toddler named Pete who’s parents and he suffered a terrible car wreck in the woods of Millhaven, Ore. As the toddler survived, but the parents did not, a legendary docile dragon which the boy names Elliot takes him into its care for the next six years until a logging company and a Forrest ranger discover the boy has been living in the wild all this time. Soon, they learn his dragon exists and a hunter party ensues to capture the magical beast while those who respect the creature look to keep it free and hidden.

Here’s what I appreciated about the film. Elliot never spoke. I was so afraid that character was going to receive the A-typical Disney date rape by having this computer generated character speak English and take that much more reality away from a plot already based in fantasy. However, someone made the decision not to and it worked much better for the integrity of the film, I felt.

I also loved the cast. Bryce Dallas Howard (Lady In the Water) as Grace the forest ranger completely sold her part. She committed and within a Disney fantasy I didn’t expect that from anyone in the film. It was a pleasant surprise and increased my respect for her as an actor.

Frankly, this live action remake of a Disney classic will probably disappoint the die hard fans of the original, I think. I wasn’t one. It’s cute, but I feel this storyline is better in the for of the Steven Spielberg directed classic E.T. The Extra-Terrestrial.

Advertisements

Read Full Post »

poster_ghostbustersEvery so often, your childhood memories and innocence is crushed for whatever reason. This time, the reason was a revamp of the 1984 comedic classic Ghostbusters. Despite not having any expectations going into this viewing, I was pleasantly surprised to find the first 30 minutes of the film decently funny. But after a while, things got stale and I just didn’t care for the movie by its end.

Not related to the original Ghostbusters storyline at all, four women start a paranormal investigation and removal business after a series of adverse spirits are released upon the city but an unknown mastermind.

You would think would think with Melissa McCarthy (Spy), and Tv’s Saturday Night Live talents like Kristen Wiig (The Martian), Kate McKinnon (Finding Dory) and Leslie Jones (Trainwreck) this movie would have been hilarious from beginning to end. But that’s about all this film had going for it; comedic star power. The script itself and material needs to be funny. Actors need a foundation to work with, and the foundation for this one was weak.

Strangely, I liked Kate McKinnon. She seemed to have to most fully developed character performance of the principal four. I looked up her career high points, and she’s done mostly vocal work for animated films, but I am eager to see what she can do showing her face down the road. Her character was overdone, but at least it was consistent and developed.

Chris Hemsworth (Thor) also provided a couple of laughs as the group’s dimwitted assistant, but once his character was possessed, the laughs pretty much ended for me. In fact, that’s the point the laughs ended for the entire movie.

I hated the presence of the Department of Homeland Security’s involvement as a subplot. It served no comedic purpose and didn’t propel anything. It was the true definition of a red herring. I also feel any Ghostbusters movie needs a strong villain. Even the sequel to the original Ghostbusters, which was total crap also, had at least a strong villain in Vigo.

What I found most annoying than the creation of a Ghostbusters revamp in the first place what the little tributes to the original film; involving actors from the original cast like Bill Murray, Dan Aykroyd, Annie Potts and Sigourney Weaver in walk on roles only annoyed me further. The appearance of the Stuff Puff Marshmellow Man and having iconic green ghost Slimer also make appearances didn’t help the film a bit. I also hated the revised versions–yes, there were more than one–of the original 80’s hit song to the first movie from Ray Parker Jr. Basically, any link this movie attempted to make to that of the original Ghostbusters didn’t sit well with me. If producers are going to make this revamp their own, they need to make it their own, period.

Lastly, I had a problem with the big throw down in Times Square where these paranormal scientists are fighting and capturing ghosts and spirits. The film showed the foursome go through a minimal amount of training with their equipment. These are scientists. Nerds, basically. They possibly don’t even possess any real self defense training, let alone combat training. However, when the fight comes to them, they turn into this set of sick-ass ninja level ghost fighters which I found EXTREMELY hard to swallow. Even in the original Ghostbusters, Venkman and company never fought anything. They captured and vanquished with their gear, but hand to hand combat was never an option. I would have had the same complaint of that film too if it did the same thing. Firefighters are trained to be firefighters. Scientists are not trained to be Jackie Chan.

The movie was terrible. McCarthy and Wiig did what we usually see them do. the screenplay lacked motivation and development, and the whole production went stale about an hour into it. I may have to say the movie went stale the moment it got the green light for production.

To read the review of this movie from my Movie Corner co-hort Brian G. Felts, click here.

Read Full Post »

%d bloggers like this: